#9325 NORM 1.5-sof: full-screen fills are slow in X

[Zarro Boogs per Child]

#9325: full-screen fills are slow in X
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------
           Reporter:  cjb              |       Owner:  cjb               
               Type:  defect           |      Status:  new               
           Priority:  normal           |   Milestone:  1.5-software-later
          Component:  x window system  |     Version:  not specified     
         Resolution:                   |    Keywords:                    
        Next_action:  code             |    Verified:  0                 
Deployment_affected:                   |   Blockedby:                    
           Blocking:                   |  
---------------------------------------+------------------------------------

Comment(by mikus):

 XO-1, py-115 build:
 {{{
 0 [~]$ python test2.py
 Test #0, n=80, elapsed=2.05, fps=39.00
 Test #1, n=80, elapsed=1.56, fps=51.40
 Test #2, n=80, elapsed=1.07, fps=74.55
 Test #3, n=80, elapsed=1.06, fps=75.35
 Test #4, n=80, elapsed=1.07, fps=74.44
 0 [~]$
 }}}
 XO-1.5, os116 build:
 {{{
 0 [~]$ python test2.py
 ALSA lib pulse.c:229:(pulse_connect) PulseAudio: Unable to connect:
 Connection refused

 Test #0, n=80, elapsed=1.40, fps=57.22
 Test #1, n=80, elapsed=1.29, fps=62.08
 Test #2, n=80, elapsed=1.29, fps=61.95
 Test #3, n=80, elapsed=1.29, fps=61.87
 Test #4, n=80, elapsed=1.30, fps=61.76
 0 [~]$
 }}}
 As I suggested in my earlier comment -- the XO-1.5 fps did not increase
 much from the first run, whereas the XO-1 fps increases to a noticeably
 higher number than on the first run.

 Also, the XO-1.5 outputs a pulse audio message, whereas the XO-1 doesn't.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9325#comment:14>
One Laptop Per Child <http://laptop.org/>
OLPC bug tracking system