#9318 NORM 1.5-ATe: Why is vmalloc=256M required for viafb?

[Zarro Boogs per Child]

#9318: Why is vmalloc=256M required for viafb?
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
           Reporter:  cjb            |       Owner:  laforge      
               Type:  defect         |      Status:  new          
           Priority:  normal         |   Milestone:  1.5-ATest    
          Component:  kernel         |     Version:  not specified
         Resolution:                 |    Keywords:               
        Next_action:  test in build  |    Verified:  0            
Deployment_affected:                 |   Blockedby:               
           Blocking:                 |  
-------------------------------------+--------------------------------------

Comment(by dsd):

 confirmed, vmalloc= isn't needed now. I too don't know which change was
 the solution, although I suspect virtual mode OFW.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9318#comment:11>
One Laptop Per Child <http://laptop.org/>
OLPC bug tracking system