#9318 NORM 1.5-ATe: Why is vmalloc=256M required for viafb?

[Zarro Boogs per Child]

#9318: Why is vmalloc=256M required for viafb?
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
           Reporter:  cjb       |       Owner:  laforge      
               Type:  defect    |      Status:  new          
           Priority:  normal    |   Milestone:  1.5-ATest    
          Component:  kernel    |     Version:  not specified
         Resolution:            |    Keywords:               
        Next_action:  diagnose  |    Verified:  0            
Deployment_affected:            |   Blockedby:               
           Blocking:            |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Changes (by laforge):

  * owner:  dsaxena => laforge


Comment:

 I think we need to double-check the OFW setting. maybe something is wrong
 there, or it gets re-set at some later point.  I'll investigate next week
 when I have physical access to a XO1.5 board

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9318#comment:8>
One Laptop Per Child <http://laptop.org/>
OLPC bug tracking system