#9318 NORM 1.5-ATe: Why is vmalloc=256M required for viafb? (was: Via framebuffer failure on 1.5)

[Zarro Boogs per Child]

#9318: Why is vmalloc=256M required for viafb?
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
           Reporter:  cjb       |       Owner:  dsaxena      
               Type:  defect    |      Status:  new          
           Priority:  normal    |   Milestone:  1.5-ATest    
          Component:  kernel    |     Version:  not specified
         Resolution:            |    Keywords:               
        Next_action:  diagnose  |    Verified:  0            
Deployment_affected:            |   Blockedby:               
           Blocking:            |  
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by cjb):

 Renaming, since this works with the vmalloc= line.

-- 
Ticket URL: <http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9318#comment:5>
One Laptop Per Child <http://laptop.org/>
OLPC bug tracking system